Andre-Louis ate his herrings and black bread with a good appetite
nevertheless. It was poor fare, but then poor fare was the common lot of poor
people in that winter of starvation, and since he had cast in his fortunes with
a company whose affairs were not flourishing, he must accept the evils of the
situation philosophically.
"Have you a name?" Binet asked him once in the course of that
repast and during a pause in the conversation.
"It happens that I have," said he. "I think it is
Parvissimus.
"Parvissimus?" quoth Binet. "Is that a family name?"
"In such a company, where only the leader enjoys the privilege of a
family name, the like would be unbecoming its least member. So I take the name
that best becomes in me. And I think it is Parvissimus the very least."
Binet was amused. It was droll; it showed a ready fancy. Oh, to be sure,
they must get to work together on those scenarios.
"I shall prefer it to carpentering," said Andre-Louis. Nevertheless
he had to go back to it that afternoon, and to labour strenuously until four
o'clock, when at last the autocratic Binet announced himself satisfied with the
preparations, and proceeded, again with the help of Andre-Louis, to prepare the
lights, which were supplied partly by tallow candles and partly by lamps
burning fish-oil.
At five o'clock that evening the three knocks were sounded, and the curtain
rose on "The Heartless Father."
Among the duties inherited by Andre-Louis from the departed Felicien whom he
replaced, was that of doorkeeper. This duty he discharged dressed in a
Polichinelle costume, and wearing a pasteboard nose. It was an arrangement
mutually agreeable to M. Binet and himself. M. Binet - who had taken the
further precaution of retaining Andre-Louis' own garments - was thereby
protected against the risk of his latest recruit absconding with the takings.
Andre-Louis, without illusions on the score of Pantaloon's real object, agreed
to it willingly enough, since it protected him from the chance of recognition
by any acquaintance who might possibly be in Guichen.
The performance was in every sense unexciting; the audience meagre and
unenthusiastic. The benches provided in the front half of the market contained
some twenty-seven persons: eleven at twenty sous a head and sixteen at twelve.
Behind these stood a rabble of some thirty others at six sous apiece. Thus the
gross takings were two louis, ten livres, and two sous. By the time M. Binet
had paid for the use of the market, his lights, and the expenses of his company
at the inn over Sunday, there was not likely to be very much left towards the
wages of his players. It is not surprising, therefore, that M. Binet's bonhomie
should have been a trifle overcast that evening.
"And what do you think of it?" he asked Andre-Louis, as they were
walking back to the inn after the performance.
"Possibly it could have been worse; probably it could not," said
he.
In sheer amazement M. Binet checked in his stride, and turned to look at his
companion.
"Huh!" said he. "Dieu de Dien! But you are frank."
"An unpopular form of service among fools, I know."
"Well, I am not a fool," said Binet.
"That is why I am frank. I pay you the compliment of assuming
intelligence in you, M. Binet."
"Oh, you do?" quoth M. Binet. "And who the devil are you to
assume anything? Your assumptions are presumptuous, sir." And with that he
lapsed into silence and the gloomy business of mentally casting up his
accounts.
But at table over supper a half-hour later he revived the topic.
"Our latest recruit, this excellent M. Parvissimus," he announced,
"has the impudence to tell me that possibly our comedy could have been
worse, but that probably it could not." And he blew out his great round
cheeks to invite a laugh at the expense of that foolish critic.
"That's bad," said the swarthy and sardonic Polichinelle. He was
grave as Rhadamanthus pronouncing judgment. "That's bad. But what is
infinitely worse is that the audience had the impudence to be of the same
mind."
"An ignorant pack of clods," sneered Leandre, with a toss of his
handsome head.
"You are wrong," quoth Harlequin. "You were born for love, my
dear, not criticism."
Leandre - a dull dog, as you will have conceived - looked contemptuously
down upon the little man. "And you, what were you born for?" he
wondered.
"Nobody knows," was the candid admission. "Nor yet why. It is
the case of many of us, my dear, believe me."
"But why" - M. Binet took him up, and thus spoilt the beginnings
of a very pretty quarrel - "why do you say that Leandre is wrong?"
"To be general, because he is always wrong. To be particular, because I
judge the audience of Guichen to be too sophisticated for 'The Heartless
Father.'"
"You would put it more happily," interposed Andre-Louis - who was
the cause of this discussion - "if you said that 'The Heartless Father' is
too unsophisticated for the audience of Guichen."
"Why, what's the difference?" asked Leandre.
"I didn't imply a difference. I merely suggested that it is a happier
way to express the fact."
"The gentleman is being subtle," sneered Binet.
"Why happier?" Harlequin demanded.
"Because it is easier to bring 'The Heartless Father' to the
sophistication of the Guichen audience, than the Guichen audience to the
unsophistication of 'The Heartless Father.'"
"Let me think it out," groaned Polichinelle, and he took his head
in his hands.
But from the tail of the table Andre-Louis was challenged by Climene who sat
there between Columbine and Madame.
"You would alter the comedy, would you, M. Parvissimus?" she
cried.
He turned to parry her malice.
"I would suggest that it be altered," he corrected, inclining his
head.
"And how would you alter it, monsieur?"
"I? Oh, for the better."
"But of course!" She was sleekest sarcasm. "And how would you
do it?"
"Aye, tell us that," roared M. Binet, and added: "Silence, I
pray you, gentlemen and ladies. Silence for M. Parvissimus."
Andre-Louis looked from father to daughter, and smiled. "Pardi!"
said he. "I am between bludgeon and dagger. If I escape with my life, I
shall be fortunate. Why, then, since you pin me to the very wall, I'll tell you
what I should do. I should go back to the original and help myself more freely
from it."
"The original?" questioned M. Binet - the author.
"It is called, I believe, 'Monsieur de Pourceaugnac,' and was written
by Moliere."
Somebody tittered, but that somebody was not M. Binet. He had been touched
on the raw, and the look in his little eyes betrayed the fact that his bonhomme
exterior covered anything but a bonhomme.
"You charge me with plagiarism," he said at last; "with
filching the ideas of Moliere."
"There is always, of course," said Andre-Louis, unruffled,
"the alternative possibility of two great minds working upon parallel
lines."
M. Binet studied the young man attentively a moment. He found him bland and
inscrutable, and decided to pin him down.
"Then you do not imply that I have been stealing from Moliere?"
"I advise you to do so, monsieur," was the disconcerting reply.
M. Binet was shocked.
"You advise me to do so! You advise me, me, Antoine Binet, to turn
thief at my age!"
"He is outrageous," said mademoiselle, indignantly.
"Outrageous is the word. I thank you for it, my dear. I take you on
trust, sir. You sit at my table, you have the honour to be included in my
company, and to my face you have the audacity to advise me to become a thief -
the worst kind of thief that is conceivable, a thief of spiritual things, a
thief of ideas! It is insufferable, intolerable! I have been, I fear, deeply mistaken
in you, monsieur; just as you appear to have been mistaken in me. I am not the
scoundrel you suppose me, sir, and I will not number in my company a man who
dares to suggest that I should become one. Outrageous!"
He was very angry. His voice boomed through the little room, and the company
sat hushed and something scared, their eyes upon Andre-Louis, who was the only
one entirely unmoved by this outburst of virtuous indignation.
"You realize, monsieur," he said, very quietly, "that you are
insulting the memory of the illustrious dead?"
"Eh?" said Binet.
Andre-Louis developed his sophistries.
"You insult the memory of Moliere, the greatest ornament of our stage,
one of the greatest ornaments of our nation, when you suggest that there is
vileness in doing that which he never hesitated to do, which no great author
yet has hesitated to do. You cannot suppose that Moliere ever troubled himself
to be original in the matter of ideas. You cannot suppose that the stories he
tells in his plays have never been told before. They were culled, as you very
well know - though you seem momentarily to have forgotten it, and it is
therefore necessary that I should remind you - they were culled, many of them,
from the Italian authors, who themselves had culled them Heaven alone knows
where. Moliere took those old stories and retold them in his own language. That
is precisely what I am suggesting that you should do. Your company is a company
of improvisers. You supply the dialogue as you proceed, which is rather more
than Moliere ever attempted. You may, if you prefer it though it would seem to
me to be yielding to an excess of scruple go straight to Boccaccio or
Sacchetti. But even then you cannot be sure that you have reached the
sources."
Andre-Louis came off with flying colours after that. You see what a debater
was lost in him; how nimble he was in the art of making white look black. The
company was impressed, and no one more that M. Binet, who found himself
supplied with a crushing argument against those who in future might tax him
with the impudent plagiarisms which he undoubtedly perpetrated. He retired in
the best order he could from the position he had taken up at the outset.
"So that you think," he said, at the end of a long outburst of
agreement, "you think that our story of 'The Heartless Father' could be
enriched by dipping into 'Monsieur de Pourceaugnac,' to which I confess upon
reflection that it may present certain superficial resemblances?"
"I do; most certainly I do - always provided that you do so judiciously.
Times have changed since Moliere." It was as a consequence of this that
Binet retired soon after, taking Andre-Louis with him. The pair sat together
late that night, and were again in close communion throughout the whole of
Sunday morning.
|